"AFTER
THE elections, 115 congressmen were voted into office as Liberal Party members.
But the attraction and admittedly the benefits of being part of the good graces
of Malacañang were hard to resist. Thus, the exodus of party members to the
fold of the new ruling party."
So
lamented LP president Sen. Francis "Kiko" Pangilinan of partymates
who jumped ship for the gravy of the Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas ng
Bayan of President Duterte.
Exodus,
indeed, as the husband of Sharon Cuneta aced it: “Unto the land flowing with
milk and honey…” the Holy Book defined it, translated to perks and privileges
exclusive to the powers-that-are.
"Wala pong pangako
na mga benepisyo, walang dagdag proyekto, walang dagdag budget. Ito po talaga
ay boluntaryong pagsapi namin na sa PDP."
So
protested Quezon City 2nd District Rep. Winston Castelo of Pangilinan’s
rationalization of their over da bakod stunt.
"The
best way to achieve our oath of office and deliver the services that we
promised last election is to go in this direction and join the administration's
party...So walang promise of
additional budget kung hindi ang
overriding factor po nito ay suportahan
ang legislative agenda ng ating
Pangulo at ma-deliver 'yung serbisyo na ating ipinangako sa taong bayan,"
Castelo said. He may have articulated as well the reasons of his fellow
fence-jumpers like Bataan Rep. Geraldine Roman, Lanao del Sur Rep. Ansaruddin
Adiong, North Cotabato Rep. Nancy Catambo, and Quezon City 5th District
Rep. Alfred Vargas.
Off
hand, we would like to posit: Walang
dagdag…so, it means mayroon naman in
projects, in budget for the good of the constituents. Ain’t that enough to serve them?
Suportahan ang legislative agenda ng ating Pangulo: This is by no means
exclusive to the ruling party, opposition members having crossed party lines –
as in the death penalty bill, as in the Gina Lopez confirmation hearings, etc.
– pursuant to the President’s agenda. So why change parties pa?
Still,
we cannot and will not fault Castelo, et al for abandoning LP, especially as he
invoked that it was the people they are sworn to serve that moved them to cross
to PDP-Laban: “Nagpunta po kami sa aming
mga constituents. At ang napag-alamanan po namin na itong desisyon na ito ang
direksyon na makakatulong sa kanila." Not merely implying but verily
Impacting there a principled stand grounded on the will of the people. Aye,
representative governance at its best here. Kuno.
It
does not in any way mean that we believe him, or any of his ilk, though. Else,
we accede to an insult to our intelligence.
Any
politician invoking the “people principle” – most especially as cause for
changing parties – ought to be shot…er, shouted, for hypocrisy.
For,
as we cited here time and again with circumstances proving us right: In
politics “no one acts on principles or reasons from them.”
What
with politicians being “…the vilest and the narrowest of sycophants and
courtiers that humanity has ever known; their sole end basely to flatter and
develop all popular prejudices, which, for the rest, they but vaguely share,
never having consecrated one minute of their lives to reflection and
observation.”
So wrote Monsieur Leroy Beaullieu of the French kind in the 1890s yet, but finding timeless and universal affirmation in all species of the political animal.
So wrote Monsieur Leroy Beaullieu of the French kind in the 1890s yet, but finding timeless and universal affirmation in all species of the political animal.
Expediency and convention, utility and interests
– self-serving, vested interests, make the fundamental matters – we could not
dare write principles here and desecrate the word – whence politics breeds.
“Itong desisyon na ito ay
hindi naman abrupt
decision. Dumaan po ito sa proseso.” Oh,
spare us, Castelo.
Balimbingan, it
is. The
game of musical chairs, or the dance of changing partners, transposed to
politics. So it is euphemized.
Butterflies flitting from one flower to the other, seeking the sweetest nectar. So politicos engaged in it are metaphored. And, put in simile, like rats abandoning a sinking, if not already sunk, ship, where the LP is now instanced.
Political prostitution, so one wag once went graphically ballistic about it.
Strange bedfellows politics does indeed make. So, sworn foes today are the sweetest friends in the next polls. The party pooper in the last elections becomes the party boy in the next.
Opportunism being the elemental rule governing Philippine politics.
Thus, it was with Marcos’ Kilusang Bagong Lipunan – the political monolith at the time of the dictatorship, only to disintegrate with the ascendancy of the coalition centered on the Laban ng Demokratikong Pilipino bannered by the sainted Cory Aquino.
Butterflies flitting from one flower to the other, seeking the sweetest nectar. So politicos engaged in it are metaphored. And, put in simile, like rats abandoning a sinking, if not already sunk, ship, where the LP is now instanced.
Political prostitution, so one wag once went graphically ballistic about it.
Strange bedfellows politics does indeed make. So, sworn foes today are the sweetest friends in the next polls. The party pooper in the last elections becomes the party boy in the next.
Opportunism being the elemental rule governing Philippine politics.
Thus, it was with Marcos’ Kilusang Bagong Lipunan – the political monolith at the time of the dictatorship, only to disintegrate with the ascendancy of the coalition centered on the Laban ng Demokratikong Pilipino bannered by the sainted Cory Aquino.
Thus, it was with
Lakas-NUCD-UMDP with the FVR presidency, losing its members to Partido ng
Masang Pilipino during Erap’s all-too-brief interregnum.
Hallelujah, it was
Lakas-CMD at the time of Gloria, only to be abandoned – oh, so ingloriously –
for BS Aquino III’s yellow LP.
So, it is now with
PDP-Laban, drawing all political bees and butterflies, birds and beasts to the
sweet scent of honey.
As it shall ever be for the
Castelos, Romans, Adiongs, Catambos, and their ilk. Until the next party in
power.
Can’t help now but think
of Quezon – “My loyalty to my party ends where my loyalty to my country
begins.”
Alas, the Castila did not live long enough to
instill an incontrovertible truth to that truism.
Hence, party loyalty
remains a contradiction in terms, and loyalty to the
country, as true as the Iskariot’s devotion to the Christ.
No comments:
Post a Comment