LAST FRIDAY, the National Union of Journalists of
the Philippines publicized an open letter to the Philippine News Agency, the
news service of the government of the Republic of the Philippines under the
care of the Presidential Communications Operations Office headed by Sec. Martin
M. Andanar.
This concerned the obvious “creative
interpretation” -- read: twisting – of the facts obtaining from the recent
Universal Periodic Review in Geneva, Switzerland of the country’s human rights
record.
The letter reads:
WE ARE writing about the posting of at least two
almost identical news items that were posted on the Philippine News Agency site
on May 15 (http://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/987860) and May 20
(http://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/989437) about DILG
Assistant Secretary Epimaco Densing’s claim on the supposed position of 95 of
the 105 countries that participated in the recent Universal Periodic Review in
Geneva, Switzerland.
Please treat this letter as both an inquiry as well
as a protest into the use of what we have always considered a legitimate news
agency to “legitimize” the blatant manipulation of the truth, a charge that,
ironically, has repeatedly been leveled at other media outfits by no less than
President Rodrigo Duterte, his spokespersons and other government officials,
thus fueling anger among administration supporters that has led to the harassment
and threatening of journalists.
While we do not question your editorial
prerogatives and do understand that you face certain limitations as a
government-run news service, we do wonder how Mr. Densing’s comments, which
apparently run counter to all other accounts of the positions the
participant-countries to the UPR actually registered, could have been reported
so uncritically.
Worse, these were reported not once but twice, with
slight rewriting in the second version, as witness below, in an apparent (to
our mind) attempt at slightly shifting the focus from that of the first
article, which was so obviously – we are sorry but there is no other term
applicable – fake from the get-go:
95
nations in 3rd UPR convinced no EJKs in PHL
MANILA, May 15 -- Ninety-five out of 105 countries that attended the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in Geneva, Switzerland were convinced that extra judicial killings (EJK) is non-existent in the Philippines.
MANILA, May 15 -- Ninety-five out of 105 countries that attended the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in Geneva, Switzerland were convinced that extra judicial killings (EJK) is non-existent in the Philippines.
DILG
Assistant Sec. Epimaco Densing, in a press conference on
Monday, said the Philippines received congratulatory messages as they
noted that this is the first time they heard that the figures reaching them
were “spoiled and rotten information.”
PHL's
human rights situation commended at UPR
MANILA, May 20 -- A total of 95 of the 109 attendees of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) held in Geneva, Switzerland early this month commended the Philippines for its improved human rights situation.
MANILA, May 20 -- A total of 95 of the 109 attendees of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) held in Geneva, Switzerland early this month commended the Philippines for its improved human rights situation.
Department
of Interior and Local Government (DILG) Assistant Secretary Epimaco Densing
said majority or 87 percent of the participants praised the Philippines after
the team presented the human rights-based development programs of the
government and the measures adopted to fulfill its obligations to the eight
international treaties ratified in the past years.
We do understand the need for PNA and other
state-affiliated outfits to project as strongly as possible the government’s
side on current issues and controversies. But does this include peddling
falsehoods?
That what Densing professes to be the truth is
clearly not is evident even with a cursory reading through the Universal
Periodic Review’s official Database of Recommendations (https://www.upr-info.org/database/index.php?limit=0&f_SUR=137&f_SMR=All&order&orderDir=ASC&orderP=true&f_Issue=All&searchReco&resultMax=100&response&action_type&session&SuRRgrp&SuROrg&SMRRgrp&SMROrg&pledges=RecoOnly).
It has not helped that the first PNA story has
already been picked up and exploited by fake news sites, which peddle Densing’s
canard to counter the international concern over the current human rights
situation in the country and to further smear mainstream media outfits that
have reported accurately on the REAL position of the countries that attended the UPR.
Our concern over the use of PNA to legitimize fake
news also stems from the possible implications this poses on the professional
reputations and yes, the safety of our many upright colleagues who work for the
venerable news agency and continue, despite the challenges they face, to keep
it reputable and worthy of people’s trust.
As a media organization and as citizens of this
Republic, we demand and expect an answer from a news agency funded by our taxes
and which we, therefore, technically own.
Looking forward to your response, we thank you very
much.
(SGD.) THE DIRECTORS
National Union of Journalists of the Philippines
National Union of Journalists of the Philippines
Joe
Pavia
SO, WHAT would have Joe Pavia said?
Asked me ABS-CBN News’ Jojo Pasion Malig in a tag
on the NUJP letter.
Joe Pavia was the most respected long-time general
manager of the PNA and no-nonsense editor of a number of publications from the
pre- to the post-martial law eras, as well as chair of the Philippines Press
Institute.
To say that Joe Pavia is a pillar of Philippine
journalism is an understatement.
I’ve been so privileged to have come under his
tutelage while still in college as stringer of PNA-Pampanga Bureau. And honored
at having been invited by him, along with my former PNA immediate boss Fred
Roxas and friend Peping Raymundo, to be a co-founder of SunStar-Clark in 1995 that latr morphed to SunStar-Pampanga.
So what would have Joe Pavia said?
Melasac ne sa ing editorial desk
qng dugdug na; mengaclac no ngan qng gulisac na (The editorial desk would have
been shattered by the slam of his fists; everybody there would have had blasted
eardrums with his scream).
The
mantra every journalist fortunate enough to have been mentored by Joe Pavia is
“Accuracy. Accuracy. Accuracy.” Be it in a news story on in an headline.
No,
he would never settle for simple fact-checking. It had to be checked,
rechecked, cross-referenced with all possible sources for a final check.
And
then, Joe Pavia had this never-the-twain-shall-meet rule with news vis-à-vis
opinion writing. At SunStar-Clark, he
expressly enjoined me to lay off news stories as I was already writing a column
and the editorials. Precisely, as news is bound by facts, and
columns/editorials stand on opinions.
Yes,
with this fictive turn at the PNA, Joe Pavia could only be turning and tossing
in his grave.
No comments:
Post a Comment