NATIONAL
HEROES Day is dedicated to men and women, known or unknown, who sacrificed
their lives for Philippine freedom.
A
national holiday, the day has become – rather than an event to remember our
heroes – one more delightful excuse for malling, vacationing, and just loafing.
Most
pronounced this year as it fell on a Monday, hence an automatic long weekend. Or
have you not noticed the traffic gridlock going to Baguio, the overcrowding of
malls, the extra vibrancy in party places?
On
the contrary, the quietude at the heroes’ monuments, save for the perfunctory
wreath-laying rites.
Save
your tears ye who hold this day sacred, the very law governing the current celebration
of National Heroes Day – RA 9492, signed by Pres. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo on
July 24, 2007 – was crafted precisely to hew to her so-called “holiday
economics,” making most holidays “movable” to Mondays and thus, long weekends
for vacation breaks, malling, and other economic generating activities. Thereby putting premium on commercial profit
from the non-working day over the nationalistic, if sentimental, remembrance of
all who consecrated their lives that this nation shall not perish.
Aye,
the day of, indeed, for heroes turned by the stroke of a pen to the
day off heroes.
It is then left to us hero-worshipping sentimentalists
to do our own private remembering, and weep.
In
my long-gone days of youth, Jose Abad Santos shared equal space with Andres
Bonifacio, Jose Rizal, and Macario Sacay in my pantheon of heroes.
Those
endless school plays of the last hours of Abad Santos highlighted by his
admonition to his son Pepito to “show these people that you are brave…that not
everyone is given the opportunity to die for his country” fixated in my thought
processes the parallel lives of Bonifacio-Rizal, Sacay, and Abad Santos.
Martyrs
all at the major epochs of our history as a people: the Spanish Colonization
for the first, the American Period for the second, the Japanese Occupation for
the third. Joined in later by Ninoy Aquino and Evelio Javier during the
home-grown dictatorship.
In
my teens, at the onset of my conscientization of socio-economic and political
issues, Jose Abad Santos was relegated to lesser lights in my own hierarchy of
heroes, in favour of another Abad Santos, his sibling Don Pedro.
Born
to the landed gentry, Don Pedro became a traitor to his class when he embraced
socialism and devoted his whole life to the propagation of the cause. I saw in
Don Perico a conversion, albeit secular, akin to that of Francis of Assisi, on the
spriritual plane. The son of a rich merchant named Pietro di Bernardone, the
monk called Brother Sun renounced his father’s wealth and turned to a lifetime
of prayer and devoted service to the poor.
Through
the years, my list of heroes grew longer: Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King,
and Angelo Roncalli, also known as Pope John XXIII; Karl Marx, V.I. Lenin, Ho
Chi Minh, and Mao Zedong; Che Guevara, all alone; Yassir Arafat as well as
David Ben-Gurion; Emiliano Zapata, whom I tend to believe, not without conceit,
was my great, great grandpa; Chino Roces, and Lorenzo Tanada.
Heroic ground
Varied
as they are, there is a common ground for my heroes, for all heroes, for that
matter. The essence of heroism draws from both the Messianic and Mosaic
elements found manifest among revolutionaries and liberators, as well as among
those who set the order of things through laws, norms or standards of human
conduct.
The
sum of a hero’s life impacts on the times and the world beyond his own. Thus,
the collective epitaph for heroes: “He left this world a better place than when
he came in.” Better yet: “Now, he belongs to the ages,” as said of Abraham
Lincoln by his Secretary of War Edwin Stanton. As indeed, heroes belong to all
ages. Revisionists, be damned.
Comes
to the mind the question: Are heroes born or made? Better phrased yet: Do
heroes create circumstances, or do circumstances create heroes?
The latter has
traditionally been the preferred position buttressed by historical epochs.
Without the American Revolution would there be a Washington? Without the Civil War, a Lincoln? Could Turkey’s Ataturk have arisen without the Ottoman persecution? Or Lenin sans the Romanov’s enslavement of Russia? And for that matter, Ninoy without the Marcos dictatorship?
Without the American Revolution would there be a Washington? Without the Civil War, a Lincoln? Could Turkey’s Ataturk have arisen without the Ottoman persecution? Or Lenin sans the Romanov’s enslavement of Russia? And for that matter, Ninoy without the Marcos dictatorship?
If memory serves right,
I think it was Arnold Toynbee that provided the synthesis to hero-born versus hero-made
contradiction, to quote liberally (from faded memory): “When he has in him to
give, and the situation demands of him to give, he has no other recourse but to
give.”
Aye, even if one possesses all elements of heroism in him – generally thought of as intelligence, honor and integrity, courage, selflessness and commitment to a cause, self-sacrifice and love for others – absent a situation that will warrant the extraction and expression of these elements – a triggering mechanism of sort – the hero will not come out of him.
Akin here the lamentation in Gray’s Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard: “…Full many a gem of purest ray serene, The dark unfathom’d caves of ocean bear. Full many a flower is born to blush unseen, And waste its sweetness on the desert air…”
Aye, even if one possesses all elements of heroism in him – generally thought of as intelligence, honor and integrity, courage, selflessness and commitment to a cause, self-sacrifice and love for others – absent a situation that will warrant the extraction and expression of these elements – a triggering mechanism of sort – the hero will not come out of him.
Akin here the lamentation in Gray’s Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard: “…Full many a gem of purest ray serene, The dark unfathom’d caves of ocean bear. Full many a flower is born to blush unseen, And waste its sweetness on the desert air…”
The essence of heroism
inheres in the person and is drawn out of him by the circumstance. Both born
and made is the hero then.
Bonifacio-Rizal. Sacay. Abad Santos. They all had in them to give. Placed in the situation, they gave it all. So, we remember them. Bonifacio-Rizal with shrines, countless monuments, educational institutions, even a match brand and a bank for the latter, movies and books, streets, barrios, towns, even a province, again for the latter. Ninoy too.
Bonifacio-Rizal. Sacay. Abad Santos. They all had in them to give. Placed in the situation, they gave it all. So, we remember them. Bonifacio-Rizal with shrines, countless monuments, educational institutions, even a match brand and a bank for the latter, movies and books, streets, barrios, towns, even a province, again for the latter. Ninoy too.
About
Sacay? One forgotten movie. About Abad Santos? A few schools and streets, and
the P1,000 bill shared with two others.
Oh
yes, I remember. The Abad Santos ancestral home in San Fernando designated as a
shrine by the National Historical Institute had long been torn down. With nothing
to even suggest it ever existed. Its NHI marker perhaps sold to the nearest
junk shop. What sacrilege!
If
that is our way of remembering our heroes, then, indeed, we are a nation
accursed. Is it not said – and said so truthfully – that a nation that does not
honor its heroes is doomed? Again, Santayana: “Those who cannot remember the
past are condemned to repeat it.”
What
future lies for us if we have opted not only to forget but even to disgrace our
heroic past?
Most despicably
disgracefully so, as in interring the remains of the dictator at the Libingan
ng mga Bayani.
No comments:
Post a Comment