“WHEREFORE, THIS court hereby (a) provisionally
dismisses the case; (b) orders the release of the cash bond…”
So ordered the Honorable Judge Jonel S. Mercado,
RTC Branch 52 in Guagua town, of Criminal Case No. G-16-11638 – People of the
Phil. vs. Diosdado “Ding” Cervantes Jr. y Cabrera, Caesar “Bong” Lacson y
Zapata, and Eduardo Manugue y Guiao – on Aug. 12, 2020. Copies of which were released
Aug. 25.
This dismissal arrived at after the complainant
SPO3 Jimmy Santos failed to be present in the hearings scheduled July 29, Aug.
5, and Aug. 12, 2020, with Public Prosecutor Marlyds L. Estardo-Teodoro manifesting she was amenable
to the provisional dismissal.
The
brevity of the order totally belies the length of time the libel case took in
court.
It was in Oct. 2015 that Santos filed a libel complaint
with the Pampanga Prosecutors Office over the news story “2 Guagua cops under fire
for hiding shabu evidence, acts of lasciviousness” inconspicuously published in
page 2 of Punto’s Aug. 10-11, 2015 issue.
Written by Ding, it cited Manugue, identified as provincial head of the Anti-Poverty
Commission, as having accused Santos of keeping from the court one of three
plastic sachets of shabu as evidence seized from a suspected drug dealer in a
buy-bust operation and putting to personal use a vehicle impounded in the raid
for use as evidence.
The
complaint was brought to court in August 2016, at the RTC Branch 50 in Guagua
town. There it remained virtually on “pre-trial” until Feb. 20, 2020 when the
Honorable Judge Amor M. Dimatactac-Romero
inhibited herself from the case “to provide a clean slate for the parties to
start with” citing the certiorari filed a year or so ago by the accused but
dismissed by the Court of Appeals, whereby it was raffled off and landed at the
RTC Branch 52.
What did not move – for a variety of reasons – for four
years under one judge, was decided in three weeks by another judge. Quirks of
justice, I just have to say. Especially given that the complainant, in all those
four years, presented himself in court not more than three times.
Long in coming, but the dismissal is finally here.
And I cannot be any happier, consoled with the thought that it did not take
another 20 years for this case to be resolved as the one previous to this had.
20 years ‘warranted’
Aye, I remember precisely praying for that with the
dismissal of the first case coming immediately after I posted bail on the
second. Writing here under the headline 20 years ‘warranted’ thus:
Uh-oh, could have been speaking too soon. Yes, I
have yet to be arraigned in one more libel case. Though I have already posted
bail – P10,000 this time – to pre-empt the issuance of any warrant of arrest.
Hopefully, this one won’t last another 20 years.
Criminal Case No. 97-149 for libel may be one for the
books, if only for the 20 years it took for its resolution.
The case was filed in 1996 by one Rowena Domingo of the Mabalacat Water District over a Sun-Star
Clark news story which exposed alleged cases of nepotism and abuse of
authority in the managerial succession in the agency. Accused were publisher Joe
Pavia, managing editor Ody Fabian, associate editor Bong Lacson, and of course
the writer whose name I can’t immediately recall.
Immediate to the filing, veteran
newsman Toy Soto brokered a meeting between us and the complainant where she
said she would withdraw the case soonest. Taking her word, we did not present
any counter-affidavits anymore and forgot all about the case.
In the course of time, Sun-Star
Clark re-birthed itself as Sun-Star Pampanga in 2001.
Ody died in February 2005, and Joe in 2011. Toy died in 2007, or thereabouts.
In November 2015, I was at the NBI
applying for clearance pursuant to the renewal of my gun licenses when CC No.
97-149 surfaced in the agency’s records with a corresponding alias warrant.
I had to rush to RTC 62 where my case
was lodged, and posted the required cash bond of P2,000 for my provisional liberty.
With RTC 62 designated a “drug court,” and me having not been arraigned yet, the
records of my case were turned over to the Office of the Clerk of Court for
re-raffle.
Atty. Rico
Initially assigned to RTC 60, CC No.
97-149 was – upon motion of my counsel Enrico P. Quiambao – re-raffled and
landed at RTC 56 in April 2016. (Reminds me I haven’t thank Atty. Rico for
being our counsel too in the case just dismissed).
Right at the arraignment in June 2016,
Rico made manifest the absence of the complainant and highlighted the number of
years the complaint remained archived without any word from the complainant or her
counsels. And moved for its dismissal.
WHEREFORE, this case is
ordered DISMISSED against accused Caesar Lacson y Zapata for lack of interest
to prosecute…
SO ORDERED. Given in open
Court this 18th day of August, 2016 in Angeles City.
Thus, the Honorable Irin Zenaida S.
Buan, presiding judge of RTC Branch 56, in a single-page decision, thoroughly
expunged any iota of guilt and definitively “unwarranted” an alias arrest order
on my person.
The case that dragged on – absent my
knowledge – for all of 20 years took but two hearings to be scratched off the
court archives.
Two decades for one case. Four years
and ten months for another. Why am I keeping my strong faith in our justice
system?
Because the cases have been dismissed
and I am exonerated. Duh!
Beyond that is my core belief that a
libel case is par for the course in the journalism field.
It is the only legal recourse of the
citizen who felt
maligned in print, broadcast, or personal utterance, to seek redress for
her/his grievance. Indeed, the exercise of a civil right in our democratic
state.
It
is precisely owing to this that I never begrudged all those people who took me
to court for libel. Seven or eight, I have lost count.
I
respected their right to seek my comeuppance for whatever perceived and felt
wrong I did them. I respected them for their civility – of going the judicial
course instead of taking the extra-judicial route with extreme prejudice…
Ay, I think I have read that in one
of my previous writings. Maybe, I can just look it up and reprint it here as
supplementary to this piece.
In the meantime, let me savor that “libel-free”
vibe after 24 long years. For who knows how short this will last.