NOTHING BUT minutes
of meetings.
So damned a grizzled local
journalist of the stories – he would not call them news – appearing in the
today’s papers.
So much advances in media
technology. So much retardation in journalistic quality, syntax and grammar
mangled, peg and context unheard, ethics perverted. And he went on to reminisce
of the good old days in local journalism, ending: So, why don’t you write about it?
I thought I already did.
But a click in my PC revealed:
IS IT the times, or it’s
just me?
This feeling of being so
Jurassic amid the current practice of journalism in the province, the subject
of a recent coffee talk with a small group of impressionable college writers.
Bred in, if not born into,
the web, the kids needed not a few repetition and re-illustration of the “old”
way we gathered facts – interviews, on-spot coverage, clandestine meetings; we
wrote the news – pen-on-paper, typewriter; and we sent stories – press collect
call, courier service, via Philippine Rabbit Bus Line for photos with the
negatives – to the editorial desks.
With communication lines
routinely going static, we had to learn the spoken phonetic alphabet,
especially with the names of suspects and their victims in crime stories. Many
times, this spelled the difference between a simple erratum and a case of
libel.
So how did we spell over
the phone the name of some suspected rapist listed in the police blotter, such
as one, fictional now, Zbigniew Levinski? Zulu-Bravo-India-Golf-November-India-Echo-Whiskey
– Zbigniew. Lima-Echo-Victor-India-November-Sierra-Kilo-India – Levinski.
Imagine the phone lines
going awry and poor correspondent me having to spell phonetically just about
every name of persons and organizations, not to mention not-easily-discernible
words in my story!
Pity more the poor deskman
taking my story – phone cradled between neck and shoulder, patiently listening
to my every word while clacking on his typewriter.
Yes, stiff necks – even
“multi-level cervical spondylosis radiculopathy with kyphosis,” more commonly
known as a pinched nerve was a common ailment of deskmen, long before it was
appropriated for a former President.
Snopake
The fax coming into being
vastly improved the facility of sending stories from the field to the desk,
greatly relieving deskmen of their neck pains. But the fax spawned what has
been derided as “Snopake journalism.”
Snopake is a brand of
correction fluid.
A what?
So, I had to tell my young
audience that before the coming of the PCs, our word processors were called
typewriters. Where we can easily delete errors in our laptops and netbooks now,
then we had to apply correction fluid on our typewriting paper to cover up
errors in text. Blow on it to dry and then type the correction over it.
Snopake journalism works
this way: After faxing his story to his desk, a newsman passes it to a peer who
simply “snopakes” the original addressee and the name of the original author,
types over it the name of his own deskman and his by-line, and then faxes the story
as his very own.
Many a time one story
appeared verbatim in a number of publications differentiated only by the
by-lines each carried. A clear case of consensual plagiarism there.
This perversion of
journalism later mutated, in adaptation to the web: E-mailed press releases,
whether from government offices or business firms, are not even re-encoded but
simply copy-pasted with the by-lines of reporters and forwarded to their
respective – but now less respectable – papers.
Indeed perverted, aye,
debauched in contemporary practice are the much-hallowed ways of olden days of
enterprise journalism, interpretative reporting, and multiple coverage.
Coverage
In our time, multiple
coverage was done this way: A single event is covered by a number of us
newsmen, each carrying two or more publications plus the wire services, thus:
Sonny Lopez of Malaya and United Press International; Elmer Cato of
Manila Chronicle and Agence France-Presse; Jay Sangil of Philippine
Daily Inquirer and Kyodo; Arnel San Pedro of Masa and Reuters;
and me with People’s Journal, People’s Tonight and Associated Press.
These aside from our local publications The Voice, Pampanga Newsweek and
The Angeles Sun.
Thus, a single event would
be carried by more publications and the wires than the number of newsmen who covered
it. Here our efforts were maximized, the results multiplied.
Today, multiple coverage
means just the opposite: A single event is covered by a number of newsmen
representing the same media entities, thus: seven, the editor included, from
one daily; 15, the janitor not excluded, from one radio station, etcetera.
Thus, the number of
newspaper and radio stations publicizing the event is much, much lesser than
the number of media workers who covered it.
The beat – or place of
assignment – of a newsman is an exclusive domain which should not be encroached
in by other newsmen belonging to the same media outlet. For example, one
assigned to cover Angeles City has no business covering the Capitol, unless
otherwise requested or instructed by his desk.
The beat boundaries so
well defined – and respected – in the past are all too hazy, too porous now,
resulting to an open, free-for-all coverage of the province.
Where before the number of
newsmen in a coverage was dictated by the impact of the event, by its newsworthiness,
now it is determined by the beneficence – and conversely, the miserliness – of
the event’s principal. Hence, “atin keni” (there is) drawing just about
everybody like bees to honey; “ala karin” (there’s none) avoiding that
somebody like the plague.
Enterprising
Which inevitably leads to
the corruption of the nobility of enterprise journalism.
Enterprise journalism goes
beyond, indeed outside, the realm of press releases and media conferences.
It engages in
investigation – hence its other incarnation as investigative reporting, in
research and in-depth analyses, in diggings – thus its being tagged as
muckraking.
Enterprise journalism does
not merely report events but takes to light the forces that effect, that shape
those events. Enterprise journalism is best paradigmed in the Philippine Center
for Investigative Journalism
A number of the enterprise stories I filed in my time included: Central Luzon:
the next war zone; Death knell for the Huk Movement; Fiesta time, killing time;
Reds join ‘cola wars’; Requiem for a River; Clark: A Field of Dreams, among
many others.
Enterprise journalism in
Pampanga today is so debased as to engage in more search than research, less in
dogged investigation than in dogging the most charitable newsmakers, its
intended end not an earth-shaking scoop but a swoop – and the inevitable sweep
of the pockets of the preyed upon subject.
Yes, what makes the
enterprising journalist in Pampanga today is not the number of screaming
headlines and frontpage multi-part series bearing his by-line. It is the number
and thickness of white envelopes that centripetally come into his orbit.
And then, there is
interpretative reporting. Basically, as The Sunday New York Times editor
Lester Markel defined, as “reporting news depth and with care, news refreshed with
background materials to make it comprehensive and meaningful… It is objective
judgment based on background knowledge of a situation or appraisal of an event
which are essential parts of news.”
A certain level of expertise
is expected of a reporter doing interpretative reporting as this requires
relevant historical background, interviews of advocates as well as adversaries,
and the writer’s own informed opinion on the causes and possible consequences
of the subject he is dealing with.
In current malpractice,
interpretative reporting simply means the newsman giving his free
interpretation, usually based on uninformed opinion, of the words and action of
the news principal.
Thus, when Senator Lito
Lapid filed a bill mandating free legal assistance to indigents, one paper
bannered: “Lapid passes free legal aid law.”
Or when the good
archbishop said he would not make any statements on the case of an errant
priest, it being already under legal process and the accused well represented
by a lawyer, came the report of the prelate issuing a gag order on the case.
Or when the governor met
with the provincial medical personnel to address the 20 cases of loose bowel
movement in the flooded towns of Pampanga, out came the headline: “Gov prevents
diarrhea outbreak.”
Yes, I am of the mind that
the body of journalism in Pampanga is diarrheal in irrelevancies and
mediocrities, idiosyncrasies, and even outright idiocies. But like a pig in its
sty, I’ve come to relish wallowing in the filth. Else, why am I still here?
(Zona Libre, Nov. 8,
2011 reprint)